YellowDanfo
LOCAL NEWS

N2.2bn Fraud: Court adjourns the trial of Ex-Gov Fayose

N2.2bn Fraud: Court adjourns the trial of Ex-Gov Fayose
N2.2bn Fraud: Court adjourns the trial of Ex-Gov Fayose

Justice Mojisola Olatoregun of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos, on Monday, March 18, 2019, adjourned hearing in the trial of Ex-Gov Fayose, to Tuesday, March 19, 2019.

According to the statement by EFCC, Ex-Gov Fayose was arraigned along with his company, Spotless Investment Limited, on October 22, 2018, on an 11-count charge bordering on fraud and money laundering to the tune of N2.2 billion.

Ex-Gov Fayose is facing trial in connection with the sums of N1.299 billion and $5.3 million out of the N4.65 million slush funds allegedly shared by the then National Security Adviser, NSA, Col. Sambo Dasuki (retd.).

At today’s sitting, the court could not continue with the cross-examination of the fifth prosecution witness, Musiliu Obanikoro, a former Minister of State for Defence, owing to the absence of the counsel to the second defendant, Olalekan Ojo, SAN, in court.

Ahmed Mustafa, who stood in for Ojo, told the court that he was “a little indisposed and could not appear in court.”

Earlier in the proceedings, the court admitted in evidence the extra-judicial statement of the late Justin Eruka, a former aide to Obanikoro.

At the last adjourned sitting on February 7, 2019, counsel to the second defendant, Spotless Investment Limited, Olalekan Ojo SAN, had moved a motion seeking the court to accept the statement of the deceased as evidence.

The prosecuting counsel, Rotimi Jacobs, SAN, had, however, objected to the admissibility of the document, arguing that the statement was not admissible in law.

“The maker of the document is dead; so, the defence only wanted to smuggle the document to the court,” he said.

Justice Olatoregun had, therefore, adjourned to today for ruling on the application.

Ruling today, Justice Olatoregun held that: “Given the fact that the maker of the document is late does not make the document irrelevant to the case before this court.

“The document is relevant to this case and I, therefore, admit the document in evidence”.

Related posts

Senator Dino Melaye Shows Off His Tastefully Furnished Living Room

yellowdanfo

State House Autonomy: “Appreciation Should Go To NASS Not President Buhari”- Senator Dino Melaye

yellowdanfo

Priscilla Ojong: Father Of Missing 300-Level Student Speaks

yellowdanfo

Breaking: Detained Zainab Aliyu regains her freedom in Saudi Arabia

yellowdanfo

Breastfeeding prevents Breast Cancer,Not Sucking By Men-Expert

yellowdanfo

Adesua Etomi-Wellington pen a lovely message to her mom at 60

yellowdanfo

Governor Wike confirms the arrest of the Wanted Bobrisky of Gokana

yellowdanfo

Police raid Lagos brothel,14 customers, sex workers arrested

yellowdanfo

IGP Mohammed Adamu redeploys senior police officers

yellowdanfo

COVID-19 Cases Hit 37,801 As NCDC Confirms 576 New Cases 

yellowdanfo

Leave a Comment